Efektivitas Pembelajaran STEM Pada IOT Smart Proyek Hemat Energi Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70115/cahaya.v3i2.341Keywords:
Learning Outcomes, STEM, IoT, Smart Proyek, Hasil Belajar, EnergiAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of implementing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) learning through an energy-saving Internet of Things (IoT) project in improving students’ learning outcomes in Grade IX at MTsN 7 Cirebon. The research employed a pre-experimental design with a one group pretest–posttest design, involving 30 students as research participants. A multiple-choice test instrument was used to measure students’ conceptual understanding before and after the learning intervention. Data were analyzed descriptively and through N-gain analysis to determine the learning effectiveness. The results showed that the students’ average pretest score of 64.00 increased to 72.07 after the intervention. The mean N-gain score reached 20.24%, with a standard deviation of 17.21 and a score range from -25.00 to 46.43. According to Hake’s gain criteria, this result falls into the low category, and based on the learning effectiveness criteria, it is categorized as “ineffective.” A total of 40% of students were in the medium category, 46.7% in the low category, and 13.3% experienced decreased learning outcomes. Although the overall effectiveness is classified as low, the findings indicate that project-based STEM learning with IoT has the potential to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and learning motivation. Further improvements in instructional strategies, more intensive guidance, and technology integration adapted to students’ needs are recommended to achieve more optimal learning outcomes.
References
Aini, M., Ali, L. U., & Suhirman, S. (2023). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Problem Based Learning (PBL) Pada Materi Elastisitas Untuk Melatih Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. CAHAYA: Journal of Research on Science Education, 1(2), 73–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70115/cahaya.v1i2.73
Ali, L. U., Suranto, Indrowati, M., & Suhirman. (2026). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of problem-based learning on science literacy. In Maila D.H. Rahiem (Ed.), Towards Resilient Societies: The Synergy of Religion, Education, Health, Science, and Technology (1st ed., Vol. 1, Issue 1). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003645542-44
Ali, L. U., Suranto, S., & Indrowati, M. (2025). Model Problem Based Contextual Learning (PBCL) Bermuatan Etnosains untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa. In A. Malik (Ed.), CV Eureka Media Aksara (1st ed.). Eureka Media Aksara. https://repository.penerbiteureka.com/publications/620370/
Ali, L. U., Azmar, Wahyuni, Jumawal, & Fitriana, I. M. (2023). Improving Science Learning Outcomes by Applying Problem-Based Learning Model. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i2.9913
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Bao, L. (2006). Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations. American Journal of Physics, 74(10), 917–922. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2210845
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among STEM subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5–6), 23–37. https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/77
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. NSTA Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. American Educational Research Association.
Hasan, I. (2004). Pokok-pokok Materi Statistik 2 (Statistik Inferensif). Bumi Aksara.
Hidayat, R., Nugraha, D., & Utami, S. (2022). Implementasi STEM dalam pembelajaran sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 10(2), 112–123. https://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/jps/article/view/xyz
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1517572
Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K–12 STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1–17. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2196-7822-1-2
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
Sa’idah, S., Makhrus, M., & Doyan, A. (2022). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah pada Materi Gelombang Cahaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v6i4.344
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Alfabeta.
Vari, Y., & Bramastia, B. (2021). Pemanfaatan Augmented Reality Untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Abad 21 Di Pembelajaran IPA. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v10i2.57256
Wahyuni, E., Ramdani, A., & Sari, L. (2023). Efektivitas pembelajaran STEM pada abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif, 11(3), 210–225. https://jurnalpendidikaninovatif.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/abc
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Supriati, Rahayu Kariadinata, Muhammad Minan Chusni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
