Persepsi Guru Terhadap Implementasi Teknik Penilaian Non-Tes Dalam Pembelajaran Kelas X Di MA Al Mansur Popongan

Authors

  • Annisa Arianti UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Aji Joko Budi Pramono UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70115/cahaya.v4i1.495

Keywords:

persepsi guru, penilaian non tes, pembelajaran, MA Al Mansur Popongan

Abstract

This study aims to analyze teachers' perceptions of the implementation of non-test assessment techniques in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) learning for grade X at MA Al Manshur Popongan. The study used a descriptive qualitative approach with a field research type. The research subjects consisted of five grade X PAI teachers who were selected purposively. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The data analysis process was supported by the R Program through the stages of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The results showed that teachers had a positive perception of the implementation of non-test assessment because it was able to assess students' affective and psychomotor aspects more comprehensively. The dominant assessment techniques used included observation, worship practices, presentations, attitude journals, group projects, and portfolios. The implementation of non-test assessment had a positive impact on increasing student activity, discipline, and self-confidence in learning. However, its implementation still faces various obstacles, such as time constraints, administrative burdens, large student numbers, and difficulties in preparing assessment rubrics. This study confirms that strengthening teacher competencies and digitalizing the assessment system are important factors in optimizing the implementation of non-test assessments in madrasas.

References

Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(2), 1–13.

Arifin, Z. (2017). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create anad use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD, 70(1), 1–5.

Pramono, A. J. B., & Jawa, Y. (2023). Analysis of Characteristics of Final Semester Examination Questions for Class IX Mathematics Using Rasch Model Theory in the Tidore Islands Region. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others, 6(3), 521-533.

Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 6–11.

Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity? National Center for Research on Evaluation, 1(1), 1–6.

Kunandar. (2015). Penilaian autentik (penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Mulyasa, E. (2017). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pratiwi, N., & Hidayat, T. (2020). Implementasi penilaian non-tes dalam pembelajaran berbasis kompetensi. Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(2), 123–135.

Pramono, A. J. B., & Retnawati, H. (2020). Implementation of cat in indonesia school: Current challenges and strategies. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081164

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior (15th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Sari, M. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi implementasi penilaian autentik di sekolah menengah. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 9(1), 45–56.

Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sudjana, N. (2016). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Walgito, B. (2010). Pengantar psikologi umum. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments To Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Wulan, A. R. (2018). Persepsi guru terhadap penilaian autentik dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 3(1), 89–102.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Arianti, A., & Budi Pramono, A. J. (2026). Persepsi Guru Terhadap Implementasi Teknik Penilaian Non-Tes Dalam Pembelajaran Kelas X Di MA Al Mansur Popongan. CAHAYA: Journal of Research on Science Education, 4(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.70115/cahaya.v4i1.495