Konstruktivisme dan Inovasi Manajemen Organisasi Pendidikan: Sebuah Kajian Paradigmatik

  • Heri Iswanto
Published on: 2026-04-22 Pages: 81-88 Section: Articles https://doi.org/10.70115/semesta.v4i1.402
Download PDF

Abstract

This article discusses the concept of constructivism as a foundation for innovation in educational organizational management, particularly in the context of educational institution governance. In an era of rapid global change, innovation in educational management is crucial to ensure the relevance and sustainability of educational institutions. The constructivist approach, which emphasizes active learning, experiential understanding, and individual knowledge construction, can be a paradigm that makes a significant contribution to designing more effective managerial systems and structures. This article uses a qualitative approach with a literature review to explore how constructivism can be applied to educational management innovation. It was found that constructivist principles can strengthen collaborative dynamics, shared knowledge-based decision-making, and the development of more adaptive and responsive managerial models to change. The results of this study indicate that the application of constructivism in educational governance can encourage

Keywords

Constructivism Innovation Educational Organization Management Educational Institution Governance Active Learning

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Heri Iswanto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Harvard University Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.

Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change. Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. (2019). Nuance: Why some leaders succeed and others fail. Corwin Press.

Gardner memperkenalkan teori kecerdasan majemuk, yang menyarankan bahwa individu memiliki berbagai bentuk kecerdasan yang mempengaruhi cara mereka belajar dan berkembang.

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice. Basic Books.

Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin Press.

Kuh, G. D., & Kinzie, J. (2007). What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature. National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

OECD. (2020). Back to the future of education: Four OECD scenarios for schooling. OECD Publishing.

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand Is To Invent: The Future of Education. Grossman Publishers.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior (16th ed.). Pearson Education.

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Rev. ed.). Doubleday.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Issue: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari 2026

How to Cite

How to Cite

Iswanto, H. (2026). Konstruktivisme dan Inovasi Manajemen Organisasi Pendidikan: Sebuah Kajian Paradigmatik. SEMESTA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 4(1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.70115/semesta.v4i1.402