Epistemologi Kebijakan Pendidikan Digital: Rekonstruksi Manajemen Pendidikan di Era Kecerdasan Buatan

Authors

  • Mulyana Surya Universitas Pakuan, Bogor, Indoensia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70115/tamaddun.v4i1.403

Keywords:

Filsafat Ilmu, Transformasi Digital, Manajemen Pendidikan, Era Digital

Abstract

Digital transformation has reshaped educational management through the adoption of learning management systems, educational analytics, and artificial intelligence in decision-making processes. This article examines the relationship between philosophy of science, particularly epistemology, and digital transformation in educational management. Using a conceptual review approach, the study explores positivist, interpretivist, and critical pragmatist perspectives based on the works of Kuhn, Lakatos, and Quine. The findings reveal that digital transformation represents not merely a technical change but also an epistemological shift in how knowledge is constructed, validated, and applied. Excessive reliance on data may lead to reductionism when contextual understanding and ethical considerations are overlooked. Therefore, a multi-epistemological approach and stronger epistemic awareness are essential for developing inclusive, adaptive, and sustainable educational management in the digital era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biesta, G. (2020). Educational Research: An Unorthodox Introduction. Bloomsbury.

Boell, S., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 257–286.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 923–938.

Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2023). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 1–21.

Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics for study success: Reflections on current empirical findings. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 1–17.

Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt.

Quine, W. V. O. (1961). From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education—A Tool on Whose Terms? Paris: UNESCO.

Williamson, B. (2021). Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice. SAGE.

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

Surya, M. (2026). Epistemologi Kebijakan Pendidikan Digital: Rekonstruksi Manajemen Pendidikan di Era Kecerdasan Buatan. TAMADDUN: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Seni, Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.70115/tamaddun.v4i1.403