Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
CAHAYA: Journal of Research on Science Education
  • Register
  • Login
cahaya

CAHAYA: Journal of Research on Science Education

CAHAYA: Journal of Research on Science Education (e-ISSN 2988-1374 ) is an open-access journal that explores science and science education within societal contexts at...
RSS Feed

Search Options

Submit your Manuscript ↗

  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Search
  • Submissions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  1. Home /
  2. Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Guidelines

Presentation

Does the paper relate a cohesive argument? Are the ideas clearly presented?

Writing

Does the title characterize the manuscript? Is the writing concise and easy to follow?

Length

What portions of the paper should be expanded? Removed? Condensed? Summarized? Combined?

Title

Does the title concise, omitting terms that are implicit and, where possible, be a statement of the main result or conclusion presented in the manuscript? Abbreviations should be avoided within the title.

Abstract

Does the abstract consist of 1) aim of the study; 2) method; 3) result or finding; and 4) conclusion?

Introduction

Clearly describing and respectively:

  • The background of the study;
  • State of the art, relevant research to justify the novelty of the manuscript;
  • Gap analysis, novelty statement;
  • Hypothesis or problem statement (optional);
  • Approach to resolve the problem; and
  • The aim of the study.

Method

  • The method is written clearly, so then other researchers can replicate the experiment or research with the same result;
  • Not only describe the definition of terms but also describe how to conduct the research;
  • Describe the location, participant, research instrument, and data analysis;

Result and discussion

  • The data presented has been processed (not raw data) into a table or figure and given a supportive description which easy to follow.
  • The result related to the original questions or objectives outlined in the Introduction section.
  • The author describes the result of the study consistent with what other investigators have reported or there any differences.
  • The author provides interpretation scientifically for each of the results or findings presented.
  • The author describes the implications of the research.
  • The author describes the limitations of the research or drawbacks to the method or position.
  • The author describes further need/areas for research or expansion of ideas.

Conclusion

Consist of:

  • Answer the objectives of the research;
  • Implication or recommendation (optional);
  • Written in a paragraph, not in bullet/numbering.

Accredited

 

Submissions

Online Submissions
Author Guidelines
Manuscrip Type
Review Guidelines
Articles Processing Charge
Licenses and Copyright

Management Team

Editorial Team
Reviewer Team
Publisher
Contact Us

EDITORIAL POLICIES

Focus and Scope
Journal History
Ownership and Management Information
Publication Ethics
Peer Reviewe Process
Screening Plagiarism
Open Acces Policy
Authorship Criteria
Allegations of Misconduct
Correction and Retracion
Conflict of Interest
Post-Publication Discussion
Archiving Policy
Site Acces Police
Indexing and Abstracting
Declaration of Generative AI

TEMPLATE

RECOMMENDED TOOLS

SUPPORTED-BY

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Visitor

Flag Counter

free web stats

CAHAYA

CAHAYA: Journal of Research on Science Education

E-ISSN 2988-1374

Alpatih Harapan Semesta

Perumahan Kila Rengganis Blok E5 Bajur Kecamatan Labuapi Kabupaten Lombok Barat Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat

Phone: 085333491112

Email: cahaya@ahs-edu.org

This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

Journal Informations

CAHAYA: Journal of Research on Science Education
More information about the publishing system, Platform and Workflow by OJS/PKP.