Teori dan Metode Otentisitas Hadis

Authors

  • BQ. Citra Handayani Institut Agama Islam Qamarul Huda, Pasca Sarjana Bagu Lombok Tengah
  • Nurul Hidayati Institut Agama Islam Qamarul Huda, Pasca Sarjana Bagu Lombok Tengah
  • Mohamad Zaki Institut Agama Islam Qamarul Huda, Pasca Sarjana Bagu Lombok Tengah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70115/tamaddun.v1i3.310

Keywords:

Method, Authenticity, Hadith

Abstract

This paper explores the authenticity of hadith, a key area of study in ‘ulūm al-ḥadīth, with a focus on the development of the sanad (chain of transmission). Sanad emerged after the death of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and while methods varied during the era of the Companions, it reached its peak by the end of the first century. The study of hadith transmission has drawn interest from both Muslim scholars and non-Muslim researchers, such as Schacht, whose “Projecting Back” theory is considered difficult to implement. Three main perspectives on hadith authenticity have emerged: a skeptical view by Mahmud Abu Rayyah, a non-skeptical view by Yusuf al-Qaradawi, and a middle-ground approach by Muhammad al-Ghazālī. This qualitative study, using library research, examines classical and modern authentication methods, concluding that both are necessary for assessing hadith authenticity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, H. (2016). Keritik matan hadis: Versus muhaddistin dan fuqaha. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia.

Ahsan, M. N. (2021). Dari sejarah ke studi hadis: Memahami metode sejarah kritis dan penanggalan hadis di Barat. Jurnal ..., 5(2).

Al-Khatib, M. ‘A. (1988). Ushu al-hadis: Ulumuhu wa mustalahuh. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Makin. (2016). Antara Barat dan Timur: Batasan, dominasi, relasi dan globalisasi. Yogyakarta: SUKA Press.

Al-Sakhawi, S. al-D. M. I. A. al-R. (n.d.). Fathu al-mugni. [Tidak diterbitkan].

Al-Salih, S. (1988). Ulum al-hadist wa musthalahuh. Beirut: Dar al-‘Ilm al-Malayin.

Al-Tahhan, M. (1979). Taysir musthalah al-hadist. Beirut: Dar al-Quran al-Karim.

Amin, K. (2009). Menguji kembali keakuratan metode kritik hadist. Jakarta: Penerbit Hikmah.

Assidqy, M. H. (2011). Pengantar sejarah ilmu hadis. Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra.

At-Tahhan, M. (1987). Usul al-takhrij wa dirasatu al-asanid. Riyad: Maktabah al-Ma’arif.

Azami, M. M. (1977). Studies in hadith methodology and literature. Indianapolis: Islamic Teaching Center.

Badawi, A. (2003). Ensiklopedi tokoh orientalis (A. Drajat, Penerj.). Yogyakarta: LKiS. (Karya asli diterbitkan sebagai Al-Mausu’ah al-Musytasyriqien).

Damalaksana, W. (2004). Hadist di mata orientalis. Bandung: Benang Merah Press.

Gotschalk, L. (1969). Understanding history: A primary historical method. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Idri. (2017). Hadist dan orientalis: Perspektif ulama hadis dan para orientalis tentang hadis Nabi. Depok: Kencana.

Ismail, M. S. (1995). Kaedah kesahihan sanad hadis. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Ismail, S. (1988). Kaedah kesahehan sanad hadis dan tinjauan dengan pendekatan ilmu sejarah. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Jardanova, L. (2016). History in practice (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.

Shalah, T. A. A. al-S. I. (1989). Muqaddimah Ibnu Slah wa mahasin al-istilah (A. A. b. Syati’, Ed.). Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif.

Su’aidi, H. (2017). Hermeneutika hadis Syuhudi Ismail. Jurnal ..., 20(1).

Suryadi. (2014). Eklektisisme dan moderatisme Imam As-Syafi’i dalam studi hadis. Yogyakarta: Idea Press.

Wazna, R. (2018). Metode kontemporer menggali otentisitas hadis (Kajian pemikiran Harald Motzki). Jurnal ..., 17(2), Juli–Desember.

Downloads

Published

27-09-2025

How to Cite

Teori dan Metode Otentisitas Hadis. (2025). TAMADDUN: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Seni, Dan Humaniora, 1(3), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.70115/tamaddun.v1i3.310

Most read articles by the same author(s)